Comments on: The Haskell Preprocessor Hierarchy http://blog.ezyang.com/2010/06/the-haskell-preprocessor-hierarchy/ Existential Pontification and Generalized Abstract Digressions Sun, 01 Jan 2017 16:49:16 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.5.2 By: Gour http://blog.ezyang.com/2010/06/the-haskell-preprocessor-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-544 Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:11:00 +0000 http://blog.ezyang.com/?p=1784#comment-544 Heh…it would be nice to have ‘one’ tool combining best from both worlds…

]]> By: Edward Z. Yang http://blog.ezyang.com/2010/06/the-haskell-preprocessor-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-542 Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:23:28 +0000 http://blog.ezyang.com/?p=1784#comment-542 Having not used bindings-DSL, I cannot comment too strongly on it. A benefit: it appears to be stronger than c2hs, with support for automated Storable generation, for example. A downside: it is built entirely on top of C macros, which in my opinion leave something to be desired.

]]> By: Gour http://blog.ezyang.com/2010/06/the-haskell-preprocessor-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-541 Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:12:40 +0000 http://blog.ezyang.com/?p=1784#comment-541 Anyone can comment about bindings-DSL/hsc2hs vs. c2hs?

Sincerely,
Gour

]]> By: Edward Z. Yang http://blog.ezyang.com/2010/06/the-haskell-preprocessor-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-528 Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:50:39 +0000 http://blog.ezyang.com/?p=1784#comment-528 Zao mentioned on #haskell bindings-DSL, which is a macro language built on top of hsc2hs.

]]>